The Reason a Computer Installer Ended Up in the Supreme Court

1. Computer technician Mr. A Received a request from an acquaintance to install computers in an office and proceeded with the installation. 2. However, it turned out to be a stock scam call center office. After the computer installation, the acquaintance occasionally asked Mr. A to dispose of computers, SSDs, etc. 3. When this group was apprehended, Mr. A was also indicted on charges including fraud, joining and operating a criminal organization, and conducting unlicensed financial investment business. While the first and second trials ruled him guilty, stating that even if it wasn't fraud or joining a criminal organization, he was guilty of aiding and abetting fraud, the Supreme Court ruled Mr. A not guilty for the following reasons: 1. Mr. A did not share in the criminal profits and only received ordinary payment. 2. Based solely on seeing stock-related materials in the office, it was difficult to assume it was an office for a group committing fraud using stocks. 3. The key evidence, the police suspect interrogation record, was used as evidence despite lacking admissibility. The police interrogation record only has evidentiary value if the suspect admits to its contents. Despite Mr. A's persistent denial, the original trial court admitted this record as evidence.