討論分潤造成的亂象

If you don't have money to buy it, why are you asking? 🙄 Keep asking where to buy it 🫠 You can't afford it anyway, so why are you so curious? 🤪 I had nothing to say, so I checked what they posted 😵 As expected, and I even seriously replied 🙃 Suddenly I pretended to reply seriously 🥺 But in reality, it was a waste of time 🤡 Maybe I should have just replied with 'Thanks for sharing' 👌 If I feel bad, I'll report it 😉

What's the meaning of posting numbers? Some numbers haven't even been counted yet. Before that, there were ABC letters too.

Are grinding posts and alien language the special products of this holiday break? Alien No. 1: Zhu Weide No. 2: Zctw (They used to be human...)

Has anyone else had their comments blocked for no reason? Please judge if there's anything wrong with my comment. The first picture shows the chat history with another player, and the second shows my comment being blocked. I've directly contacted customer support to ask what's going on with the blocking. Please don't let the AI block things randomly. I'll post again if I get a response.

Taking a break and spamming the board, are they sick or just dumb?

Why can they still post? They don't care about all the duplicate posts (╬◣д◢)

I unintentionally discovered that a certain moderator's reply on a certain board wasn't hidden, while some comments were blocked. Out of boredom, I conducted an unscientific experiment: are there unspoken rules for short comments? (Everything below is encrypted. I've also randomly deleted my own comments, as I don't want the 'scarecrow' comments to understand too much.) Example 1: Thank You Posters can reply with 'Thank You' under their own posts; commenters cannot leave 'Thank You' on others' posts. Currently, I've found three sets that can be used to respond to scarecrows, and posters can try them too?! Experience 2: He Can Do It, But I Can't? Sometimes, you'll notice in comment notifications that someone's comment was blocked, but the same comment appears in the same post! Through unscientific experimentation, if you really dislike a certain type of 'scarecrow' comment, report it. Once successful, the next time they say the same thing, it will be blocked by the system 🤣 (Of course, they can appeal, and if successful, it becomes invalid.) There are a few other interesting things, but for now, let's 'let the bullets fly for a while' and talk next time...

Let me do the math. 2500 gems = 25 gold = 1 TWD Let's say your daily profit share is 5,000 to 10,000. (Sorry for using my own numbers) That's 50 or 100 gold. Are the people on this board really "jealous" of 2-4 TWD? Am I understanding this correctly? The stock market fluctuates way more than that in a day. Who would care about 2-4 TWD? 🫠

I specifically asked the official team about the revenue sharing calculation method, and here are two key points from the result: 1. Regarding the calculation cycle and evaluation criteria for revenue sharing The revenue sharing plan doesn't solely look at daily activity. Instead, the system comprehensively evaluates overall activity data and accumulated interactions from the community over the past several days. This means that for those who leave spam comments or don't reply, I can take action by deleting all their past comments, preventing them from receiving revenue share. 2. Handling malicious flooding and comment spam on boards To maintain a good community atmosphere, the evaluation algorithm for the revenue sharing mechanism has incorporated multiple quality and anti-spam measures. It's not a case of 'you get revenue share just for leaving a comment'; meaningless, low-quality interactions left solely for the purpose of farming rewards are subject to review and dynamic evaluation by the system. I think this response is great because it shows the official team is taking action, and I hope everyone realizes that simply leaving comments doesn't guarantee revenue share.

The official recently launched an AI contest. However, there's a clear rule stating that 'except for announcing on one's own board, you must not solicit votes elsewhere.' Please refer to this post for details: [Playio] 【Board AI Grand Prize】 Submissions are now open! https://link.playio.co/u6b4rd Then, some genius directly solicited votes right under that rule post. That person is really brave 🤪 Seriously, they could donate their corneas. Do you guys think this is acceptable? w I personally think it's a no-go.