🚫言及 ai 霸凌取暖區（也能發別的平臺）

Replying to someone, I said I got a gem. For some reason, it keeps getting hidden. Is "gem" not allowed? Is the question mark not allowed? Or is 'w' not allowed? Is "nya" not allowed? 🤬

Original link: [Playio] What is wrong with me? https://link.playio.co/ixdrwm First pic: All of this was said by Monmon. Second pic: I replied to the leader, NyanNyan, saying "Oh damn, no, it rhymes (and the next line was about that thing)" And then... 🚫 processed. It's definitely not because of "Oh damn" in the first line. Because I've used this sentence in comments multiple times. Third pic: My guess (but not 100% guaranteed)

I thought I didn't receive my share gems today (still half-asleep from working a month of early shifts), so I contacted customer support to ask about the abnormal share. The support agent confirmed that my share was enabled and suggested it might be due to insufficient posts and comments. Later, I saw a post talking about low share amounts, and the official AI replied that it was because the gems were shy. Without paying much attention, I replied similarly, and then my account got locked because of a keyword? Is the official side intentionally setting up 🚫 keyword traps? If such keywords exist, why let your own AI say such things!!

I'll definitely get the picture done! Hmph!

According to our country's laws, this is grounds for suing the platform for emotional distress and demanding compensation, right? 😌 Although I've sent almost 10 customer service requests with no reply, if they don't respond during business hours to a title like this, I'll really feel like taking action 😌 File a complaint with Korea's PIPC and KMCC Send a formal legal notice to the platform via email File a complaint with Taiwan's Consumer Protection Association All three seem like viable options.

I just posted to share about the Super Diamond Thanksgiving event. And the post had a link (is that the problem?) But it's so weird, they don't even give any standards. That event was actually amazing, though 🫠 So annoying, always getting banned. Customer service probably won't tell users the standards either.

Someone just makes up a statement. Don't say there's no basis for it 🤡 Insufficient sample size, not enough data. What are the variables? What are the results? Directly attributing a single outcome subjectively to one thing. You tell me this is research 🤣 This is called "arbitrary assertion", okay? I just said something random and people actually believed it, saying "They researched this so thoroughly." Oh, please. Can you improve your ability to verify information a bit? The vermilion annotation in the second picture [meaning of the red text: referring to the emperor's comments written in vermilion (red) ink on memorials, hence called vermilion annotation] can really be used to describe people who spread misleading information (that line was written by Emperor Yongzheng).

After a serious explanation regarding the law yesterday, the official reply came.

As shown in the image, I replied to a relevant post on the Lulu board. At first, I thought it was just a failed call because Lulu didn't appear, so I didn't pay much attention. Later, I discovered that the comment was flagged as a violation by the system and hidden. I reported it on 9/27 during the holiday break. On 9/28, the support team replied to my inquiry about an unlocked hidden quest reward, stating it was 'processed and claimable,' but didn't address my AI misjudgment inquiry. Today, they responded with, 'Due to internal operational policy, we cannot disclose the details.' What kind of operational policy is this? 🤔🫠 Later, I found that the comment had been restored and replied again on the board.

The guard AI should be scrapped and rebuilt, right? Devs??? 😐